Issues with Estulin’s ‘Tavistock’

Social Engineering the Masses

Over time (with the more I’ve read) I’ve noticed some inaccuracies or slight misrepresentations in Estulin’s “Tavistock” book.

It’s still a really great book and important referential text.

Its value as a concise well-cited “infogrenade” far outweighs the stuff I will mention.

Here is some of Ch. 4: If this is new info to you & it doesnt 🤯 …check a mirror, cuz you’ve already turned ghoul

Raw Chapter 4+ notedump:

As an example of what I mean when I say “slight misrepresentation”. Estulin fixates in one of the passages above on the word “n*crophilia”.

well a few months ago I finally got around to look into this which meant slogging through Adorno’s verbose (probably drug-addled) writing

I am NOT a fan of Adorno and hate to have to defend him, but folks like Adorno and Paulo Friere seem to use it as euphamism: meaning things that reduce humans to just the material.

The previous quote was found in Paulo Friere’s book “Pedagogy of the Oppressed”. I found the “n*crophilia” quote (everyone was referencing) ~556 pages deep in a snoozy analysis of Adorno’s snoozy analysis of Shoenburg’s SNOOZY-ass music:

The above clip is from Adorno’s “Essays on Music” I’ve attached the full page below so you can judge yourself

Anyway, I dont like Adorno (I own a first printing of “Authoritarian Personality”), but it’s important to corroborate Estulin who otherwise does a good job.

P.S. there’s another mini-thread on Adorno, David McGowan, Owsley Stanley, LSD, and The Grateful Dead (aka “The Warlocks” which was their original name 🤣) here:

End Thread

-Restart Thread ↩︎️

-Exit Thread 🔙